The following excerpt is from yesterday’s Wednesday audience of the Holy Father in which he offered a reflection on the life of St. Francis. This particular passage concerns St. Francis’ meeting with the sultan in Egypt in 1219, (my unofficial translation from the Italian):
Also the successor of Innocent III, Pope Honorius III, with the bull Cum dilecti of 1218 supported the singular development of the first Friars Minor, who went opening missions in various countries of Europe, and in Morocco. In 1219 Francis obtained permission to go and speak, in Egypt, with the Muslim sultan Melek-el-Kâmel, in order to preach the Gospel of Jesus there also. I wish to underscore that this episode of the life of Saint Francis that has great relevance. In an age marked by an ongoing conflict between Christianity and Islam, Francis, armed only with the faith and his personal gentleness, effectively followed the path of dialogue. The reports speak about a benevolent acceptance and cordial reception to us from the Muslim sultan. It is a model that even today must inspire relations between Christian and Muslims: promote dialogue in truth, in reciprocal respect and mutual understanding. (cfr Nostra Aetate, 3).
This passage is consistent with remarks made by then Cardinal Ratzinger in 2002 to which Paul Moses made reference in his comment on my previous post about Mr. Moses’ article on the subject:
Only then did [St. Francis] really know that the Crusades were not the appropriate way to protect the rights of Christians in the Holy Land, but that one had to take literally the message of the imitation of the Crucifix.
And here is the passage of Nostra Aetate, Declaration on the Relation of the Church to Non-Christan Religions (Paul VI, 1965), to which the Holy Father refers in the first quote above:
The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth, who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their deserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting.
Since in the course of centuries not a few quarrels and hostilities have arisen between Christians and Moslems, this sacred synod urges all to forget the past and to work sincerely for mutual understanding and to preserve as well as to promote together for the benefit of all mankind social justice and moral welfare, as well as peace and freedom.
I should acknowledge where my presentation seems to be in accord with the Holy Father’s remarks and where may not seem so. While what Pope Benedict has to say on the subject is not a matter of faith and morals but of historical fact, I would like to show it the appropriate and pius deference.
The primary historical sources, which I upheld, indicate that St. Francis was in fact abused and threatened by the sultan’s subjects but not by him. They also indicate that such abuse was related to the identification of Islam by the friars as a false religion. The Holy Father’s remarks only make direct reference to the encounter of the saint and the sultan. The Holy Father identifies a more resolute opposition of the saint to the crusades, whereas I stated that the sources only identify St. Francis’ relative opposition to specific abuses.
Worthy of note in this regard is the difference between the Holy Father’s statement of 2002 and that of yesterday. In his remarks of 2002, before his elevation to the papacy, he indicates that St. Francis judged the crusades to be an inappropriate manner of defending the rights of Christians in the Holy Land. In the paragraph quoted from yesterday’s Wednesday audience, Pope Benedict makes no reference to St. Francis’ opposition to the crusades, but only commends St. Francis for choosing dialogue as the best means of evangelization. Perhaps he is distancing himself his previous historical assessment of the crusades, or what he judged to be St. Francis’ historical assessment. Father Peter Damien Fehlner pointed this out to me, when I sent him the present post for his review. In connection with the Holy Father’s modified statement relative to the crusades, Father Fehlner writes:
What he is saying in the light of Nostra Aetate is that today, for the sake of evangelization, we should forego that option, which is not the same thing as condemning the medieval and modern (Lepanto, Vienna) crusades as evil or useless. His position is inspired by St. Francis, but the possibility and appropriateness of this inference in our changed circumstances does not imply that this would have also been the conclusion of Francis in his times.
Clearly the Church wishes to promote peace, and prefers the way of dialogue to the that of war. Though pacifism as a moral imperative is not the teaching of the Church, her pastoral philosophy, especially today, entreats us to avoid war as much as possible, aided not only by human ingenuity but by the grace of God.
It remains a fact, that the relationship between the Christian West and Islam is a highly contentious issue. And while most Westerners, including myself, have a very limited understanding of the culture of Islam, because most of us have very limited or no first-hand experiences with individual Muslims, there can be little question that Islamic jihad is one of the most dangerous threats today to world peace and to national and international security. My objection to Mr. Moses’ presentation was principally that I believe the comparison of Obama to St. Francis, and the policies of Obama himself, are wholly unrealistic.
If we need to consider the pastoral philosophy of St. Francis, we also need to have an accurate understanding of what the crusades actually were, and what threat Islamic fundamentalism posed against the West at that time and continues to pose today.
Thanks to Dawn Eden for alerting me to the Holy Father’s general audience on St. Francis.
Filed under: Catholicism, Chivalry, Culture, Heroes, Knaves, Knights, Manliness, Men, News, Politics, Religion, Swordplay Tagged: Barack Obama, Crusades, Damietta, Islam, Islamic Jihad, Paul Moses, Pope Benedict, St. Francis of Assisi, Sultan Melek-el-Kâmel 
